Taking the Analphilosopher's Challenge

Analphilosopher has justly condemned the Ted Rall atrocity of a cartoon.

(Max Leader: I don't know how to do permalinks. Can you insert one here for me?)

He wonders if any liberals will condemn it.

I'm your huckleberry.

Ted Rall should be beaten about the head and shoulders with his own severed limbs.

Of course, I may not be a "liberal" as Analphilosopher defines the term. I call myself liberal because I believe that the government has a role in improving the general welfare. Analphilosopher defines a liberal as someone who is only after power and hates America. Bad liberals! Bad!

I would also like to second the Maximum Leader's critique of Analphilosopher's Fallacies #4 (scroll down to yesterday's posts). If one does not acknowledge that Animals have the same moral weight as humans, it is entirely consistent to accept the killing and eating of animals while also being desirous of minimizing or eliminating the suffering of our meals-to-be.