Kerry/Bush
It's pathetic that the best argument for Kerry is that Bush is a lousy President and the best argument for Bush is that Kerry will probably be a lousy president.
They both suck. The Bush administration is dishonest, shrouded in secrecy, and extremist. Kerry doesn't exactly project confidence, and has yet to really define a platform beyond "I'm not Bush." Granted, I think the "I'm not Bush" gets him half the way there in my book.
Still, the case against Kerry is mostly a vague smattering of inuendo and character assasination. The case against Dubya is 4 years of pathetic extremist leadership, an avoidable war, and an occupation in a terrorist infested nation with absolutely no exit strategy.
They both suck. The Bush administration is dishonest, shrouded in secrecy, and extremist. Kerry doesn't exactly project confidence, and has yet to really define a platform beyond "I'm not Bush." Granted, I think the "I'm not Bush" gets him half the way there in my book.
Still, the case against Kerry is mostly a vague smattering of inuendo and character assasination. The case against Dubya is 4 years of pathetic extremist leadership, an avoidable war, and an occupation in a terrorist infested nation with absolutely no exit strategy.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home